Friday, February 4, 2011





7 comments:

  1. Again, really strong images. My favorite is definitely the second to last one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The fourth and fifth ones are my favorite. For the fourth I would either raise or lower the image so it's not bisecting the page.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The sideways ones are a bit harder to read. I agree with Nick about making it either top or bottom heavy.

    Maybe a touch of color somewhere? Especially in the last one so the background doesnt take over.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm really liking the image of the asphalt in the background, especially 2, 3, and 4. I really like the white area next to the image.

    5 has potential, and I can't really put my finger on what I don't like about it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. hey there,
    I really like the variations that you did with the pavement. They are all really great, the first two pavement ones are the better ones, i guess. The typography, and everything, this pretty much looks like it could be a finished piece. If the image of the pavement is not your own, or your clients, I would suggest using your own, which I am sure you had intended on doing anyways.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The texture is choice, helps pop that logo out a lot. The sideways body text is a no go for a poster though, I really like the last two here, mostly because they're clean and dirty at the same time. The last one could use a little body text or slogan to help convey a message as to what it is your organization does.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't like the top one at all. the concept is interesting, but the delivery is not. Do you have other ideas, because I only see two here. I don't understand the package from what I have seen. The grunge from the road and the smoothness of the co-op don't really match the logo (which I like).

    Also, the co-op seems to just be floating on top of the pavement. I would suggest trying to grunge it up with a brush. I like the one that is second from the bottom the best. I think you could make the negative space more interesting though.

    ReplyDelete